<<<<<
Here is the 'official' policy on acronyms by anonymous authors, from http://acronyms.co.nz/guidelines.html:
Don't send lists of acronyms which you've found somewhere else on the internet - I know there are some out there but I'd prefer it if the ACRONYMS stack were preserved for the people who want to be in it.
>>>>>
I did read that, and I have no intention of just regurgitating lists of other people's acronyms. I just thought that one sounded particularly interesting (and I've had it in my own 'interesting phrases' list for several years now, so it's been around for a while)
That's one of the reasons why I quite firmly said that I didn't want credit for it, since it's not mine. But I have no doubt that it can also be found in other acronym archives, too.
<<<<<
Anyway, perhaps that one is 'especially good' - it certainly gets points for being an expansion of ACRONYM itself. I'll think about it. I'll probably not get any closer to making a decision, but I'll think about it nevertheless. Sometimes I think I think too much, but I stop thinking that in an effort to remedy the problem.
>>>>>
I know the feeling - I often think I'm thinking too much, but then I think that thinking I'm thinking too much is also thinking too much. And then I think that thinking too much about ... or maybe I just go (more) insane.
Recursion (n): see Recursion.
<<<<<
As for your ACRONYM, I rather like it. In the interests of increasing the number of regular contributors to this site, I have to say that I think it is a sign of many great acronyms to come. It also buys you one month's subscription* to the sporadic mailouts of THE ACRONYM TIMES**, if you want it.
>>>>>
Sure, sounds interesting
Though I'm not sure how regular I could be - for some reason I find it harder to use web-based boards than newsgroups or mailing lists.
